Will Other States Follow Michigan and Allow Real-Money Online Casinos in 2025?

This content was produced in partnership with Bazoom Group.

Michigan surprised plenty of observers in 2024 when its three Detroit-based gambling venues, along with regulated internet platforms, generated over $1 million in gaming taxes. The total revenue generated helped push the state’s combined iGaming and in-person receipts to nearly $2.9 billion, solidifying Michigan’s status as a leader in the online gambling market.

The state’s surge in gambling revenue has drawn the attention of lawmakers in other states, who are considering similar legislation. Although the future can be difficult to predict, the success of Michigan’s system, where taxes fund public education, first responder support, and responsible gambling initiatives, has drawn attention from lawmakers looking to capitalize on the financial benefits observed in Michigan.

Real-Money Casinos vs. Other Choices

Have you ever wondered what are social casinos? These platforms allow you to play slots, table games, and more—but with virtual credits instead of actual dollars. States without legalized iGaming options often see residents looking for alternative ways to enjoy casino-style games.

Social-style sites have been popular for years. They typically offer basic forms of poker, blackjack, or slots and allow players to compete casually without the same regulatory hurdles that come with real-money wagering. Even though these sites don’t pay out winnings in cash, they’re still an interesting glimpse into the appeal of casino entertainment.

Why Michigan’s System Turned Heads

Michigan’s model highlights how strong regulatory oversight and partnerships with tribal and commercial operators can produce significant tax income. For instance, the Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) reported that 2024 iGaming receipts hit $2.4 billion, significantly more than the prior year’s total. Officials used that windfall for programs benefiting responsible gambling initiatives as well as the agricultural and equine sectors.

The model provides a template for other areas that want new revenue sources and it’s also part of a bigger national conversation about gambling, especially as more states approve online betting on sports. Some believe that allowing online casinos is the next logical step, following the boost that sports betting brought to state coffers.

Possible States to Watch in 2025

Several states are rumored to be debating real-money iGaming proposals. Each one brings unique details, but they share a few common reasons for considering a regulated environment: new tax sources, the potential for job growth, and a desire to attract tourism or keep existing players from crossing state lines (or accessing unregulated sites). Here are a few that analysts often mention:

Maryland

There is talk of a new push to regulate internet gambling. Observers believe the state wants to build on its sports wagering success by adding more betting options and routing a portion of the revenue toward local programs.

Virginia

Internet sports betting is already available, and some legislators like Senator Mamie Locke have pre-filed a bill adding table games and slot-style options for in-state operators. A possible 15% tax rate has been floated in earlier proposals, but discussions continue.

Florida

The Seminole Tribe’s influence is significant in that market. If they decide that full internet casino gaming could benefit both the tribe and the state, there might be a serious push to make it happen. Still, the path may involve plenty of negotiations.

Illinois

Lawmakers introduced a handful of bills in 2024 that ultimately stalled, but the concept keeps coming up in committee meetings. Given the state’s success with sports wagering, supporters feel online casinos are a natural fit.

Each state handles gambling differently. Some have constitutions that require a public vote, while others depend on legislative sessions. That means no single blueprint fits every state.

The Roadblocks

Not everyone embraces real-money casinos. Public debate often focuses on whether these platforms might encourage recklessness. Others argue that brick-and-mortar venues could lose foot traffic if people are allowed to gamble on their phones.

In many places, elected officials remain on the fence, so progress could depend on economic arguments about taxes, consumer protections, and the existing popularity of betting apps.

Conclusion

Michigan’s 2024 results show that real-money internet casino gaming can channel hundreds of millions of dollars into public programs. While many states are still on the fence, it seems likely that a few will explore new laws in 2025. Whether they follow Michigan’s lead will depend on debates about tax benefits, job creation, and consumer safety.

If you or anyone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.